Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the four given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All Animals are Pets. Some Dogs are Animals. No Pet is Cat. Conclusions: I. Some Dogs are Pets is a possibility. II. Some Animals are Cats is a possibility. III. Some Cats are Dogs.Solution
Some Dogs are Animals (I) + All Animals are Pets (A) → Some Dogs are Pets (I). Hence conclusion I does not follow. All Animals are Pets (A) + No Pet is Cat (E) → No Animals is a Cat (E). Hence conclusion II does not follow. Some Dogs are Pets (I) + No Pets is Cat (E) → Some Dogs are not Cat (O). Hence conclusion III does not follow.
Part III of the Constitution of India provides for Equality of opportunity in matters of ____________ employment.
Which of the following statements accurately reflects the constitutional status of Part 9B (Cooperative Societies) after the Supreme Court's judgment in...
Under Section 13(2), what is the mandatory timeline and procedure for challenging an arbitrator
Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980) held that:
Court of Justice is defined under which section of IPC?
Which part of the Constitution contains provisions related to Panchayats?
Article 25(1): “Subject to public order, morality and health… all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to prof...
Which of the following Articles in the Constitution deals with the applicability of habeas corpus?
In case the imprisonment awarded exceeds 3 months and Solitary Confinement has to be imposed, how many days of solitary confinement can be granted in on...
Acts of a Judge is covered under S. 77 of IPC if-