Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some apple are banana. All banana are pear. No pear is papaya. Conclusions: I. Some apple are pear. II. Some apple are papaya. III. No banana is papaya.Solution
Some apple are banana (I) + All banana are pear (A) тЖТ Some apple are pear (I). Hence conclusion I follows. Some apple are pear (I) + No pear is papaya (E) тЖТ Some apple are not papaya (O). Hence conclusion II does not follow. All banana are pear (A) + No pear is papaya (E) тЖТ No banana is papaya (E). Hence conclusion III follows.
рд╡рд░реНрддрдиреА рдХреА рджреГрд╖реНрдЯрд┐ рд╕реЗ рдЕрд╢реБрджреНрдз рд╢рдмреНрдж рд╣реИ:┬а
рдирд┐рдореНрдирд▓рд┐рдЦрд┐рдд рдореЗрдВ рд╕реЗ рдЕрд╕рдВрдЧрдд рд╡рд┐рд▓реЛрдорд╛рд░реНрдереА рд╢рдмреНрдж-рдпреБрдЧреНрдо рд╣реИ :
рдЖрд╡рд╢реНрдпрдХ┬а
рдирд┐рдореНрдирд▓рд┐рдЦрд┐рдд рдореЗрдВ рд╕реЗ 'рдХрд░реНрддреГрд╡рд╛рдЪреНрдп' рдХрд╛ рдЙрджрд╛рд╣рд░рдг рдХреМрдирд╕рд╛ рд╣реИ?
рдЬреЛ рдХрднреА рдорд░рддрд╛ рдирд╣реАрдВ┬а
рдирд╢реНрд╡рд░
рджрд┐рдП рдЧрдП рд╡рд╛рдХреНрдп рдореЗрдВ рдХрд╛рд▓реЗ рд╢рдмреНрдж рдХрд╛ рддрддреНрд╕рдо рд╢рдмреНрдж рдЬреНрдЮрд╛рдд рдХреАрдЬрд┐рдПред
рд╣...
тАШ рдХреБрдЯрд┐рд▓тАЩ рдХрд╛ рдкрд░реНрдпрд╛рдпрд╡рд╛рдЪреА рд╣реИтАФ┬а
' рд╕рдВрддреЛрд╖ ' рдХрд╛ рд╕рдВрдзрд┐ рд╡рд┐рдЪреНрдЫреЗрдж рдХреНрдпрд╛ рд╣реЛрдЧрд╛ ?
рд╕рд░реНрдк┬а┬а