Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some apple are banana. All banana are pear. No pear is papaya. Conclusions: I. Some apple are pear. II. Some apple are papaya. III. No banana is papaya.Solution
Some apple are banana (I) + All banana are pear (A) β Some apple are pear (I). Hence conclusion I follows. Some apple are pear (I) + No pear is papaya (E) β Some apple are not papaya (O). Hence conclusion II does not follow. All banana are pear (A) + No pear is papaya (E) β No banana is papaya (E). Hence conclusion III follows.
As per the Court Fees Act which of the following documents are chargeable with any fee?
Which of the following committee made recommendations of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016?
According to Section 87 of the Industrial Relation Code, 'no court shall cognizance of any offence punishable under industrial Relation code save on a ...
As per the Indian Stamp Act if an instrument falls within two or more descriptions in Schedule I, how is the duty charged?
As per the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, what is the minimum amount of default for the insolvency and liquidation of corporate debtors, as specified b...
Which of the following is a ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act?
Order 32 of CPC is related to:
What is the condition for members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to exercise powers and jurisdiction in a state as per the Delhi Special Poli...
Which Section of the Indian Penal Code. 1860 deals with right to private defence of body and property?
Indian Evidence Act does not expressly mention about