Question
Three statements are given, followed by three conclusions
numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All Games are Sports Some Sports are Player No Player are Team Conclusions: I. Some Games are not Player II. Some Sports are not Team III. All Team are GamesSolution
All Games are Sports (A) + Some Sports are Player (I) → No conclusion. Hence neither conclusion I nor III follow.
Some Sports are Player (I) + No Player are Team (E) → Some Sports are not Team (O). Hence conclusion II follows.
The Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA) was established by the Government of India under the Agricultural and...
What constitutes the use of criminal force under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita?
Suits other than for compensation for wrongs done to person or immovable property shall be filed at:
Among the following what is provided under the Law of Evidence _______ .
What does the principle of novus actus interveniens refer to in tort law?
What is the time frame for filing an appeal to the National Commission against an order passed by the Central Authority under sections 20 and 21 of the ...
When the office of Registrar id temporarily vacant, who has the power to act as a Registrar till permanent arrangement is made?
Which of the following is included in the definition of "fraud" according to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Fraudulent and U...
The Constitution of India provides that the promotion of International peace and security is considered as a _____________
'A' prosecutes 'B' for adultery with 'C, A's wife. 'B' denies that 'C' is A's wife, but the court convicts 'B' of adultery. Afterwards, 'C' is prosecute...
Relevant for Exams:
