Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Only a few Chair is Wall. No Wall is Table. Only a few Table is Board. Conclusion: I. All Board being Wall is a possibility. II. Some Table is not Chair.Solution
No Wall is Table(E) + Only a few Table is Board (I) → Some Board are not Wall (O*) → Probable conclusion → All Wall may be Wall(A). Hence conclusion I does not follow. Only a few Chair is Wall (I) + No Wall is Table(E) → Some Chair are not Table(O). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
What kind of memory is static and non - volatile?
A computer ________ is a malicious code which self-replicates by copying itself to other programs
Which of the following is a benefit of using a microservices architecture in software development?
Which networking device connects multiple networks and selects the best path for data to travel?
The Application Layer of the OSI model provides services directly to the:
Which of the following software is generally preferred most, to write a House Report to the Principal of the school, with some basic text and paragraph ...
What is the purpose of NAT (Network Address Translation) in a computer network?
What is the purpose of the ARP (Address Resolution Protocol) in a computer network?
Software that disrupts the normal function of computer is known as
An AND gate