Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Only a few Chair is Wall. No Wall is Table. Only a few Table is Board. Conclusion: I. All Board being Wall is a possibility. II. Some Table is not Chair.Solution
No Wall is Table(E) + Only a few Table is Board (I) β Some Board are not Wall (O*) β Probable conclusion β All Wall may be Wall(A). Hence conclusion I does not follow. Only a few Chair is Wall (I) + No Wall is Table(E) β Some Chair are not Table(O). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
Which state of India has the highest area under forest?
The most suitable irrigation method for horticultural trees is ___
Which of the following substances is specifically used as a miticide, a chemical agent designed to target and control populations of mites, which are s...
A group of commercial crops of perennial nature, cultivated extensively in tropical and subtropical situations which need employment of labour through o...
ICAR- Central Agroforestry Research Institute is located at
This practice involves the removal of one-year shoots or fresh growth from the entire crown of a tree or plant. This practice is often performed to obta...
An aggregation of trees occupying a specific area that is sufficiently uniform in composition, age, arrangement, and condition, distinguishing it from a...
Downy mildew or green ear disease of bajra is caused by
What is the scientific name of Silver Oak?
According to Champion and Seth (1967), which is NOT one of the 5 major groups of forests in India?