Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Only a few Chair is Wall. No Wall is Table. Only a few Table is Board. Conclusion: I. All Board being Wall is a possibility. II. Some Table is not Chair.Solution
No Wall is Table(E) + Only a few Table is Board (I) → Some Board are not Wall (O*) → Probable conclusion → All Wall may be Wall(A). Hence conclusion I does not follow. Only a few Chair is Wall (I) + No Wall is Table(E) → Some Chair are not Table(O). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
Complete a simple hash function for a string s that sums the ASCII values of its characters and then takes the modulo of a prime number M.
def si...
A Java method attempts to extract a substring.
public class StringProcessor {
  public String extractPart(String text, int start, int ...
The latency of a network isÂ
There is a BST and below is the Pre order of the BST, What will be it’s In order
150 70 60 80 250 200 350
What does Cyclomatic Complexity measure in software engineering?
The Process Control Block (PCB) does not typically contain which of the following information?
A software developer is designing a banking application where each bank account object should restrict direct access to its balance variable to prevent ...
The following Python code intends to enforce that all `Worker` subclasses implement a `work` method. However, it's not working as expected.
class...
The Maximum Power transfer theorem states that maximum power is delivered when_______
What is the purpose of the CASE statement in SQL?
Relevant for Exams:
