Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Only a few Chair is Wall. No Wall is Table. Only a few Table is Board. Conclusion: I. All Board being Wall is a possibility. II. Some Table is not Chair.Solution
No Wall is Table(E) + Only a few Table is Board (I) → Some Board are not Wall (O*) → Probable conclusion → All Wall may be Wall(A). Hence conclusion I does not follow. Only a few Chair is Wall (I) + No Wall is Table(E) → Some Chair are not Table(O). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
Which of the following statements is FALSE?
Which of the following countries became the first member of the European Union to recognize the State of Palestine?
The relationship between algae and fungi in Lichens is called as
Particles of matter are continuously moving due to their:
In a school of 50 students, the number of boys and girls is in the ratio of 4:1. The boys have an average score of 38, while the girls have an average s...
Using 'lower of cost and net realisable value' for the purpose of inventory valuation is the implementation of which of the following concepts?
Marked price of an article is Rs.250 more than its cost price. If profit earned is equal to the discount given then find the profit earned?
Consider the following statements:
1. The salary allowance of a high court judge is decided by parliament.
2. The salary of a high co...
Which of the following order is given to the plantes of solar system on the basis of their sizes?
The first elaborate description of Upanayana Sanskar is found in the
Relevant for Exams:
