Question
In the question below there are three statements followed
by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Mobiles are Covers. Only a Few Covers are Phones. No Phone is Camera. Conclusions: I. 100% Covers can be Phones. II. Some Phones cannot be Mobiles. III. No Mobile is a Phone.Solution
Only a Few Covers are Phones (I) → Some Covers are Phones (I) and Some Covers are not Phones (O). Hence conclusion I does not follow.
Some Mobiles are Covers (I) + Only a Few Covers are Phones (I) → No conclusion. Hence neither conclusion II nor III follow.
"Relationship is not a factor to affect credibility of a witness" held by the Supreme Court in
A Bank Draft is:
According to the Code on Social Security, 2020 what is the definition of the term aggregator?
According to the IBC if the operational creditor does not receive payment from the corporate debtor or notice of the dispute, the operational creditor m...
Which of the following is the Appellate Tribunal under the Competition Act?
A agrees to sell to B, for Rs. 1,000, “my white horse”. A has two white horses.
A makes an attempt to steal jewels by breaking open a box, but finds after opening it that the box is empty. Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 20...
Z's will contains these words: "I direct that all my remaining property be equally divided between 'A', 'B'& C."'A' dishonestly scratches out B's name, ...
Who conducts community mediation under The Mediation Act, 2023?
What is the minimum number of members required to form a private company ?