Question
Three statements are given followed by three
conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: No bottle is a cup. All bottle are plates. Some plates are spoons. Conclusions: I. All plates can never be cup. II. No bottle is spoon. III. At least some spoons are bottle.Solution
No bottle is a cup (E) → Conversion → No cup is a bottle (E) + All bottle are plates (A) → Some plates are not cup (O*) → Probable conclusion → All plates can never be cup (A). Hence conclusion I follows. All bottle are plates (A) + Some plates are spoons (I) → No conclusion. Hence neither conclusion II nor III follow.
X Ltd. and Y Ltd. amalgamate to form a new company Z Ltd. X Ltd.’s assets are ₹50 lakh, liabilities ₹20 lakh. Y Ltd.’s assets are ₹30 lakh, li...
The arrangement of assets and liabilities in accordance with a particular order is known as of balance sheet. Â
Valuing inventory at cost or net realizable value is based on which principle?
 ICDS II deals with which of the following aspect?
Under the SARFAESI Act, if a borrower defaults and fails to repay after notice, what is the maximum imprisonment prescribed for obstructing asset recovery?
What is the rate of Tax Deduction at Source from insurance commission?
(Commission amount is ₹20,000 and assessee is an individual)
Advance amount received from customers is not considered as sale. It is based on which concept?
Under the SARFAESI Act, secured creditors can enforce their security and take possession of assets without court intervention if the borrower’s accoun...
In India, the GST is based on the dual model GST adopted in:
What is the maximum loan amount available under the Pradhan Mantri Vishwakarma Scheme?
