Question
In the question below some statements are given
followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion definitely follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Oranges are Apples. All Apples are Mangoes. No Mango is Pear. Conclusions: I. Some Apples are Mango. II. Some Oranges are Pear. III. No Pear is Apple.Solution
All Apples are Mango (A) βI.I. β Some Apples are Mangoes (I). Hence conclusion I follows. Some Oranges are Apples (I) + All Apples are Mangoes (A) β Some Oranges are Mangoes (I) + No Mango is Pear (E) β Some Oranges are not Pear (O). Hence conclusion II does not follows. All Apples are Mangoes (A) + No Mango is Pear (E) β No Apples is Pear (E) β Conversion β No Pear is Apples (E). Hence conclusion III follows.
Financial statements of a company should be prepared as per ________ and they should give true and fair view.
ABC analysis is mainly used for:
For an NBFC-MFI (Microfinance Institution), what is the minimum proportion of its assets that must be in the form of microfinance loans?
Which of the following instrument is subject to counter party risk?
An Indian insurer receives βΉ5 crore as foreign premium from a US-based NRI. As per FEMA guidelines, how should the transaction be treated in its books...
The Bharat Bill payment system (BBPS) is a one-stop ecosystem for payment of all bills providing an interoperable and accessible bill payment service a...
What is the maximum deduction allowed under Section 80U of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for an individual with a severe disability?
What type of banking transaction allows a customer to temporarily invest their money with the bank in exchange for higher interest rates, but with limit...
A companyβs estimated tax liability for FY 2024β25 is βΉ20 lakh. It has already paid βΉ4 lakh in the first installment (15 June). Calculate the am...
Under the Expected Credit Loss (ECL) model, how are trade receivables without a significant financing component measured for impairment?