Question
In the question below some statements are given
followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion definitely follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Oranges are Apples. All Apples are Mangoes. No Mango is Pear. Conclusions: I. Some Apples are Mango. II. Some Oranges are Pear. III. No Pear is Apple.Solution
All Apples are Mango (A) →I.I. → Some Apples are Mangoes (I). Hence conclusion I follows. Some Oranges are Apples (I) + All Apples are Mangoes (A) → Some Oranges are Mangoes (I) + No Mango is Pear (E) → Some Oranges are not Pear (O). Hence conclusion II does not follows. All Apples are Mangoes (A) + No Mango is Pear (E) → No Apples is Pear (E) → Conversion → No Pear is Apples (E). Hence conclusion III follows.
Which Act was repealed and replaced by the Competition Act, 2002?
Which of the following statements is incorrect about the second appeal ?
Which of the following is not correct with respect to wagering agreement?
The proceedings of the Appellate Tribunal shall be conducted in________ as per the Securities Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules
When is an arrested person entitled to meet an advocate of his choice?
 The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has held in the case of _______ that sale of immovable property through GPA is not valid.
A, knowing the B has committed dacoity, knowingly conceals B in order to save him from legal punishment which offence has A committed ?
What is the tenure for which an auditor can be appointed as per the Companies Act?
Different minimum rate of wages may be fixed for
 I.       Different Scheduled Employments
 II.       Different loca...
The President can proclaim emergency on the written advice of the