Question
Two statements are given, followed by three conclusions
numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some jokers are caps. All caps are clowns. Conclusions: I. Some clowns are jokers. II. All clowns are jokers. III. No clown is a joker.Solution
Some jokers are caps (I) + All caps are clowns (A) → Some jokers are clowns (I) → Conversion → Some clowns are jokers (I). Hence conclusion I follows but conclusion II and III do not follow.
What are Eligible Companies under section 76 of the Companies Act, 2013?
 Indian Stamp Act came into force on
As per S.4 of the Coal Bearing Areas, Acquisition and Development Act, 1957,___________ shall give a notice of it’s intention to prospect for coal in ...
Which of the following test determines that damage is remote or not?
a. Test of reasonable foresight
b. Test of directness
c. Test ...
As per the provisions of the  Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, what does the term "deceitful means" include in cases where a person engages in sexual intercou...
In which of the following section of sale of Goods Act, 1930 'Unpaid seller' is defined ?Â
No suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 shall be brought:
The fundamental test to attract s 10 is whether on final decision being reached in the previous suit, such decision would operate as res judicata in the...
Under which section of IT Act, stealing any digital asset or information is written a cyber-crime?
 What are the precautions to be taken in case of fire as laid down under the Factories Act, 1948?
Relevant for Exams:
