Question
In the question below some statements are given
followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion definitely follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Lawns are Prawns. All Prawns are Fishes. No Fish is Whale. Conclusions: I. Some Prawns are Fish. II. Some Lawns are Whale. III. No Whale is Prawn.Solution
All Prawns are Fish (A) →I.I. → Some Prawns are Fishes (I). Hence conclusion I follows. Some Lawns are Prawns (I) + All Prawns are Fishes (A) → Some Lawns are Fishes (I) + No Fish is Whale (E) → Some Lawns are not Whale (O). Hence conclusion II does not follows. All Prawns are Fishes (A) + No Fish is Whale (E) → No Prawns is Whale (E) → Conversion → No Whale is Prawns (E). Hence conclusion III follows.
Which of the following Acts provided a system of federal rule in India?
राजस् थान में कहाँ पर श्श्जैविक अभयारण् यश्श् स्थित ह�...
Which Indian state has the highest literacy rate?
By 2024, how many houses had been completed under the PMAY-Gramin scheme, according to the Ministry of Rural Development?
Which of the following types of coverage is NOT provided under PMSBY?
According to Rutherford atomic model, the electrons revolve around the nucleus in ________ paths.
Ahmedabad city in Gujarat is situated on banks of which river?
When was the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojna (Gramin) launched?
Which island holds the title of being the largest in the world?
What is the approximate share of renewable energy in India’s total installed electricity production capacity