Question
In the questions given below, there are three
statements followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Few Mirrors are Tables. Some Tables are Chairs. All Tables are Desk. Conclusion: I. All Chairs can be Desk. II. Some Tables are not Chairs. III. Some Mirrors being Chairs is a possibility.Solution
Some Tables are Chairs (I) → Conversion → Some Chairs are Tables (I) + All Tables are Desk (A) → Some Chairs are Desk (I) → Conversion → Some Desk are Chairs (I) → Probable conclusion → All Chairs can be Desk (A). Hence conclusion I follows but conclusion II does not follow. Few Mirrors are Tables (I) + Some Tables are Chairs (I) → Probable conclusion → Some Mirrors may be Chairs (I). Hence conclusion III follows.
Which famous sorting algorithm uses the divide-and-conquer strategy?
What is the correct syntax to declare a variable in C?
In SQL, which keyword is used to retrieve data from a database?
A firewall that monitors the state of active connections and makes decisions based on the context of those connections is known as a:
What is the main purpose of the parity bit in error detection?
Which component is responsible for translating virtual addresses to physical addresses?
What is the scope of a variable declared as "static" inside a function?
How can the Banker's algorithm be used to prevent deadlocks?
The java.sql and javax.sql are the primary packages for JDBC 4.0.
In tuple calculus, what does the ∃ symbol represent?
Relevant for Exams:
