In the question three statements are given, followed by three conclusions, I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement
All toasters are grinders
All toasters are juicers
Some toasters are squeezers
Conclusion
I. Some squeezers are juicers
II. Some grinders are squeezers
III. All grinders are juicers
Some toasters are squeezers (I) → conversion → Some squeezers are toasters (I) + All toasters is juicers (A) → Some squeezers are juicers (I). Hence conclusion I follows. Some toasters are squeezers (I) → conversion → Some squeezers are toasters (I) + All toasters are grinders (A) → Some squeezers are grinders (I). → Conversion → Some grinders are squeezers (I). Hence conclusion I follows. All toasters are grinders → conversion → Some grinders are toasters (I) + All toasters are juicers (A) → Some grinders are juicers (I). Hence conclusion III does not follow.
Both during and after the trial, she felt so black and blue .
Select the most appropriate meaning of the bold idiom in the given sentence.
My aunt has the gift of the gab and can socialize in any group....
Reap the whirlwind
Persuade an unwilling person to do something by using force or threats.
The last straw
a repeated passage in music
Choose the opposite word.
Walk on eggshell
Select the most appropriate meaning of the Bold idiom in the given sentence
Our PM is received with open arms wherever he goes.
Choose the correct option showing the meaning of the Idiom highlighted in the given sentence
The company's new product was a game-changer.
