Question
In the question below some statements are given
followed by three conclusions I, II, and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion definitely follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Medals are Awards Some Rewards are Awards No Award is Appraisal Conclusions: I. Some Rewards are not Appraisals II. Some Medals are not Appraisals III. Some Medals are RewardsSolution
Some Rewards are Awards (I) + No Awards are Appraisals (E) → Some Rewards are not Appraisals (O). Hence conclusion I follows. Some Medals are Awards (I) + No Awards are Appraisals (E) → Some Medals are not Appraisals (O). Hence conclusion II follows. Some Medals are Awards (I) + Some Rewards are Awards (I) → Conversion → Some Awards are Rewards (I) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion III does not follow.
Which famous sorting algorithm uses the divide-and-conquer strategy?
What is the correct syntax to declare a variable in C?
In SQL, which keyword is used to retrieve data from a database?
A firewall that monitors the state of active connections and makes decisions based on the context of those connections is known as a:
What is the main purpose of the parity bit in error detection?
Which component is responsible for translating virtual addresses to physical addresses?
What is the scope of a variable declared as "static" inside a function?
How can the Banker's algorithm be used to prevent deadlocks?
The java.sql and javax.sql are the primary packages for JDBC 4.0.
In tuple calculus, what does the ∃ symbol represent?
