Question
Statements : All covers are chairs
>Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â No chair is a table. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Some tables are caps. Conclusions :Â Â Â Â Â I. Some caps are chairs. II. Some caps are not chairs. III. All caps may be tables. In each of the questions below are given three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
No chairs are tables(E) + Some tables are caps(I) ⇒ Some caps are chairs(O*). Hence, conclusion I does not follow but conclusion II follows. Some tables are caps(I) ⇒ Probable conclusion ⇒ All caps may be tables(A). Hence, conclusion III follows.
As per Section 7(2) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, if a proposal prescribes a specific manner in which acceptance must be made, and the acceptance is...
As per SC(R ) Act, contracts in derivative shall be legal and valid if such contracts are
Which of the following statements regarding a pawnee is correct?
Under Section 2(a) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which of the following best describes the essence of a proposal in contract law?Â
How can ratification occur in a contract of agency?
What is the entitlement of an agent in the absence of any contract to the contrary?
Under the Land Acquisition Act, 2013, the minimum period of notice for the acquisition of land is
Which statement accurately reflects the definition and legal effect of a "contract of indemnity" under Section 124 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872?Â
Which of the following is not a valid reason for the termination of an agency?
A general lien as per section 171 of the Contract Act can be exercised by whom?