Question
Statements: Some woods are tables. All
tables are teaks. No teak is a chair. Conclusions: I. Some woods are teaks. II. Some woods are not chairs. III. Some tables are not chairs. In each question below are given three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
Some woods are tables (I) + All tables are teaks (A) ⇒ Some woods are teaks (I) + No teak is a chair(E) ⇒ Some woods are not chairs(O) . Hence, conclusion I and II follows. All tables are teaks(A) + No teak is a chair(E) ⇒ No table is a chair(E) ⇒ Conversion ⇒ Some tables are not chairs(O). Hence, conclusion III follows. Alternate Method: Minimum possibility: 
Who is the author of the book “Lal Salaam”?
Who has been appointed as Punjab National Bank’s first-ever female brand ambassador?
Which African country recently qualified for its first FIFA Men’s World Cup, becoming the second-smallest nation to do so?
To revive the Namda Craft which state pilot project has been started?
Under which UNESCO programme is the INCOIS People Centred Tsunami Early Warning for India (PCTWIN) initiative included?
GoKwik and which credit card bill payment platform has partnered to extend the latter’s payment options to brands on the GoKwik platform & to enhanc...
Under White Revolution 2.0, milk procurement is targeted to increase by what percentage over the next five years?
How many goals did India score against Japan to win the women's Asian Champions Trophy hockey title?
The Children's Right to Free and Compulsory Education Act came into effect from 1 April 2010, which received Presidential assent and was notified as law...
Which city had the highest number of entrepreneurs featured in the Hurun U30 List 2025?