Question
Statements: Some woods are tables. All
tables are teaks. No teak is a chair. Conclusions: I. Some woods are teaks. II. Some woods are not chairs. III. Some tables are not chairs. In each question below are given three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
Some woods are tables (I) + All tables are teaks (A) ⇒ Some woods are teaks (I) + No teak is a chair(E) ⇒ Some woods are not chairs(O) . Hence, conclusion I and II follows. All tables are teaks(A) + No teak is a chair(E) ⇒ No table is a chair(E) ⇒ Conversion ⇒ Some tables are not chairs(O). Hence, conclusion III follows. Alternate Method: Minimum possibility: 
Ferrous compounds’, catechol and ascorbic acid are used in active packaging as:
a.   Ethylene scavenger
b.   Oxygen scaveng...
The chemical name of vitamin B6 is
Food processing in India is concentrated in which sectos?
Which of the following is a Class II product?
The protein allowance for pregnant women is:
The “Repeating Unit” of glycogen is:
In enzyme purification ______ process is used to separate or isolate suspended particles.
Which of the following spore forming bacteria may lead to overcooked and degraded canned food?
The skin of vegetable are removed by
Which of the following packages is an example of aseptic packaging?