Question
Statements: Some woods are tables. All
tables are teaks. No teak is a chair. Conclusions: I. Some woods are teaks. II. Some woods are not chairs. III. Some tables are not chairs. In each question below are given three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
Some woods are tables (I) + All tables are teaks (A) ⇒ Some woods are teaks (I) + No teak is a chair(E) ⇒ Some woods are not chairs(O) . Hence, conclusion I and II follows. All tables are teaks(A) + No teak is a chair(E) ⇒ No table is a chair(E) ⇒ Conversion ⇒ Some tables are not chairs(O). Hence, conclusion III follows. Alternate Method: Minimum possibility:
Concerning the GST Council's regularization of taxation issues, consider the following statements:
1. The GST Council is deciding on whether pack...
How much financing did the World Bank approve to help India accelerate low carbon energy development in its second round?
What is the rate of interest earned on CRR maintained by banks with RBI?
Which of the following correctly defines the term ‘monopsony’?
Which of the following lowers the interest rate risk by neutralizing the inflation risk?
Consider the following statements regarding the use of bullion:
1) Bullion can be used for investment purposes as a hedge against inflation.
...What is the role of the Insurance Ombudsman in India?
The rate of interest equalization for Manufacturers and Merchant Exporters under the interest Equalization Scheme for Pre and Post Shipment Rupee Export...
Which of the following metric of the bank is dependent on the movements of the interest rate?
How much procurement from MSEs is mandated under the Public Procurement Policy?