Question
Statements: Some woods are tables. All
tables are teaks. No teak is a chair. Conclusions: I. Some woods are teaks. II. Some woods are not chairs. III. Some tables are not chairs. In each question below are given three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
Some woods are tables (I) + All tables are teaks (A) ⇒ Some woods are teaks (I) + No teak is a chair(E) ⇒ Some woods are not chairs(O) . Hence, conclusion I and II follows. All tables are teaks(A) + No teak is a chair(E) ⇒ No table is a chair(E) ⇒ Conversion ⇒ Some tables are not chairs(O). Hence, conclusion III follows. Alternate Method: Minimum possibility:
What are Eligible Companies under section 76 of the Companies Act, 2013?
 Indian Stamp Act came into force on
As per S.4 of the Coal Bearing Areas, Acquisition and Development Act, 1957,___________ shall give a notice of it’s intention to prospect for coal in ...
Which of the following test determines that damage is remote or not?
a. Test of reasonable foresight
b. Test of directness
c. Test ...
As per the provisions of the  Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, what does the term "deceitful means" include in cases where a person engages in sexual intercou...
In which of the following section of sale of Goods Act, 1930 'Unpaid seller' is defined ?Â
No suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 shall be brought:
The fundamental test to attract s 10 is whether on final decision being reached in the previous suit, such decision would operate as res judicata in the...
Under which section of IT Act, stealing any digital asset or information is written a cyber-crime?
 What are the precautions to be taken in case of fire as laid down under the Factories Act, 1948?