Question
Statements: All counsellors are teachers.
Some teachers are candidates. All candidates are students. Conclusions: I. Some counsellors are students. II. Some students are not teachers. III. No counsellor is a teacher. In each of the questions below are given three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
A + I = No conclusion, hence conclusion I does not follow. Here, all the given statements are positive statements and both conclusion II and conclusion III are negative conclusion. As we know that no negative define conclusion can be drawn from the positive statement, we can say that neither conclusion II nor conclusion III follows. Alternate Method:
Statements: A = C > G > H = B > O; E < P = R > B
Conclusions:
I). E > H
II). H ≤ E
...Statements : M ≤ N; O < R; O = N; S ≥ Q; N > S
Conclusions :
(i) Q < M (ii) N ≥ Q (iii) M > R
...Statements: P ≥ S ≥ C ≤ U; N ≥ S < G ; C ≤ M
Conclusion I. P ≥ N II.M < S
...Statements:
J © K * R, U % R $ Z
Conclusions:
I. Z $ J
II. U % K
III. U © J
In the question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the following conclusion(s) among the three conclusions is/are true and then ...
Statements: A < B = C < D, A > E = F ≥ G ≥ H > I
Conclusions:
I. D > I
II. E = I
Which of the following symbols should replace the question mark (?) in the given expression in order to make the expressions B ≤ D as well as F > B de...
In which of these expression ‘N > G’ is definitely True?
Statements: S * K, T $ K, K @ B
Conclusions: a) S $ B b) S @ B
...Statements: X = P ≥ M; M > M > I > L; P < L < G
Conclusions:
I. G > I
II. X ≥ L
III. L < L