Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
given statements: P * R, M & N, R $ M After converting: P ≥ R, M < N, R = M After combining: P ≥ R = M < N Conclusion a → P @ M → P > M The relation between P and M in the statement P ≥ R = M < N : P > M As the relation between P and M is P ≥ M . So, it can be true. Conclusion b → P $ M → P = M The relation between P and M in the statement P ≥ R = M < N : P ≥ M. So, it can be true.
What does misrepresentation mean as laid down under the Contract Act?
Opinion as to handwriting is relevant under:
Is there any condition restraining alienation in Transfer of Property Act?
Evidence in the proceedings of 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 shall be recorded in the manner:-
In which year the provisions of Section 16-A which allow keeping of books in computer floppies diskettes was inserted in the Registration Act, 1908?
Examination of a person by a party who call him as witness is-
Sapinda Relationship is based on the principles of:
Indian Evidence Act does not expressly mention about