How many persons sit between the one who works in company R and the one who works in company P, when counted from right of J?
Three persons sit between E and the one who works in company F. K sits third to the left of the one who works in company F. Two persons sit between K and S, who does not work in company F. Case 1 will be dropped because two persons sit between K and S, who does not work in company F. U sits third to the left of S. Neither S nor U is an immediate neighbour of E. The one who works in company P sits second to the right of T. M sits immediate right of the one who works in company P. The one who works in company H sits fourth to the right of J. The one who works in company W sits immediate right of A. Case 2A will be dropped because the one who works in company W sits immediate right of A. Case 2B will be dropped because A and J are not immediate neighbours. As many persons sit between L and the one who works in company R is same as the persons sit between L and the one who works in company Q. Immediate neighbour of K neither works in company R nor works in company Q. The one who works in company I sits immediate right of the one who works in company Q. As many persons sit between the one who works in company B and the one who works in company R is as same as the number of persons sit between the one who works in company Z and the one who works in company W. The one who works in company Z and the one who works in company W are not immediate neighbours.
The term ‘industry’ has been defined under which Case?
Limited Liability Partnership is a:
Which of the following is not true about RBI transacting Government business in India?
Which of the following is NOT an interim order?
Which of the following Section of Code of Criminal Procedure enables the police to examine accused during investigation?
Where the committee of creditors resolves to replace the interim resolution professional, it shall ________________________
The liability of independent tort feasors is
An unregistered document can be admitted in evidence as regards an existence of contract in a _________________
The Historic Judgment of Privy Council m Pakala Narayan Swami vs. The King Emperor deals with:
A member or part time member of the Board shall not be appointed as Presiding Officer or Member of the Securities Appellate Tribunal