Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Get Started with ixamBee
Start learning 50% faster. Sign in nowStatement I:
The passage clearly states that exposure does not guarantee protection and some children still develop allergies, so I is not a valid inference. Statement II:
The passage says "exposure to pet dander and microbes in early childhood may help build immunity", so this is clearly supported. Statement III:
The passage mentions that some children may still develop allergic reactions, which shows there are exceptions, so this statement is also valid.
Statement: Should the government revoke the GST and bring in the previous tax regime?
Argument I: Yes, the state governments are unable to recove...
Statement : The findings, which appear in the latest issue of the journal ‘Frontiers in Robotics and AI’, suggest that virtual interviewers could ...
Statement: Should India follow a one child policy like China in order to control the population explosion?
Argument I: Yes, this is the only way ...
Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong...
. Statement: Is reservation for women in Lower house of Parliament of India, theLok Sabha, and in all statelegislative assembliesjustified?
...
Directions: In the question below, a passage is given followed by few statements. Read the passage and answer the questions that follow.
Even w...
To boost workplace productivity, it is important to give employees longer working hours. The rationale is simple: more hours at work means more time to ...
Statement: Should there be a complete ban on extracurricular activities in college.
Arguments:
I. No, there is nothing wrong in...
Statement- “Just like your mobile number, you could soon move your account from one bank to another without having to change the account number” RBI...