Question
In the question below some statements are given
followed by two conclusions I, and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion definitely follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Only a few Joker are Circus Some Joker are not Pets Some Pets are Clown Conclusions: I. All Circus are Joker II. Some Clown are Pets is a possibilitySolution
Only a few Joker are Circus → All Circus may be Joker (A). Hence conclusion I does not follow. Some Pets are Clown (I) → Probable conclusion → Some Clown are Pets (I). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
 Who has the power to constitute the National Company Law Tribunal?
Which of the following actions by a service provider would constitute "deficiency" under Section 2(11) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019?Â
A is tried for the murder of B by beating him with a club with the intention of causing his death.
Which of the following is a relevant fact?
Which of the following describes the effect of the 44th Amendment (1978) of the Constitution on property and emergency provisions?
Article 2 of the Constitution of India (As amended) states. Parliament may by law ________ new states on such terms and conditions as it thinks fit.
Section 72A penalises which of the following?Â
Doctrine of Res gestae is an exception to?
S. 32 of the Indian Evidence act covers:
Under the Income Tax Act, 1961, which of the following incomes is fully exempt from tax in the hands of the individual taxpayer?
What does the term "Vis Major" refer to?
Relevant for Exams:
