Question
In the question, three statements are given, followed by
three conclusions, I, II & III You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statements: (I) Some Chips are biscuits (II) All biscuits are Chocolates (III) All Chocolates are sweets Conclusions: (I) Some Chips are Chocolates (II) Some Chocolates are Chips (III) All biscuits are sweetsÂSolution
The correct answer is D
How should wages be paid according to the Code on Wages?
Confession by the accused while in custody of police is not admissible as provided under Section?
No objection as to Jurisdiction shall be allowed by ___________________ except when it was taken before the court of first instance at the earliest poss...
Any person aggrieved by an order ¬¬¬_________________ may prefer an appeal to a Securities Appellate Tribunal having jurisdiction in the matter.
...When is a person said to abet the doing of a thing?
The case Badruddin Rukonddim Karpude v. State of Maharashtra relates to_____.
First Information Report is mentioned under
Whether a HUF can become partner in LLP:Â
Who has the right to file a complaint with the Rent Control Court under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act?
The Principle of Res-Judicata does not apply when?
Relevant for Exams:
