Question
In this question, after a statement i and ii two
conclusions have been given. Assuming the given in the statement together as truth, consider both the findings together and decide on which one of them follows beyond the logical and appropriate skepticism based on the information given in the statement. Statement: weight is proportional to height Conclusion: i) If weight grows, height decreases. ii) If height increases, then weight decreases. Choose the appropriate one of the following options (A) only follows the conclusions i (B) Only conclusions follow ii (C) either i or ii follows (D) neither i nor ii follows (E) both i and ii followSolution
Given the statement "weight is proportional to height," let's evaluate the conclusions: i) "If weight grows, height decreases." ii) "If height increases, then weight decreases." Since the statement asserts that weight is proportional to height, it does not imply a direct causal relationship between weight and height as suggested by either conclusion. Therefore, neither conclusion logically follows based solely on the statement. Hence, the correct option is (D) neither i nor ii follows.
Which of the following is considered an "existing Unit" under the SEZ Act?
What does the Writ of Prohibition, which is used a means to exercise judicial review, mean?
In which chapter of Indian Evidence Act provisions regarding Burden of Proof are codified
Which of the following fundamental right/ restriction is only available to/ against a citizen of India?
Under the Right to Information Act, 2005, which section provides for "Exemption from disclosure of information"?Â
Which jurisprudential principle best supports the concept of "utmost good faith" (Uberrimae fidei) in insurance contracts?
On what grounds can the chairperson or member of FSSAI be removed?
In the landmark case Virsa Singh v. State of Punjab (1958), the Supreme Court laid down the principles for distinguishing between culpable homicide and ...
Under Section 4 of the Bankers Books Evidence Act, 1891, a certified copy of any entry in a banker's book is admissible as:
What can the Central Government do regarding the Employees' Provident Fund?
