Seven persons namely – Reena, Heena, Gautam, Ziyana, Hari, Rohit and Jyoti are sitting in a row not necessary in same order in such a way that some are facing north while others are facing south. Reena sits third to left of Hari, either of them sits at end of the row and Rohit sits immediate left of Reena. Rohit sits second to left of Ziyana, who is facing south. How many person sits facing south?
I. Person sitting immediate neighbor of Ziyana sits fourth to right of Jyoti. Person sitting at end of the row sits facing in opposite direction and Gautam sits third from right end. Hari faces north direction.
II. Person sitting immediate left of Rohit sits fourth to right of Jyoti and Gautam sits second to left of Hari.
We have: Reena sits third to left of Hari, either of them sits at end of the row, which means we get two possibilities, in case (1) Hari sits facing north at right end and in case (2) Reena sits at extreme left end. Rohit sits immediate left of Reena and Rohit sits second to left of Ziyana, who sits facing south, that means case (2) is not valid, in case (1a) Reena sits facing south and in case (1b) Reena sits facing north. Based on above given information we get: From I: We have: Person sitting immediate neighbor of Ziyana sits fourth to right of Jyoti, which means Jyoti must sits facing south. Person sitting at end of the row sits facing in opposite direction, which means person at left end sits facing south. Gautam sits third from right end, which means case (1a) is not valid. Based on above given information, we have following result: Case1a Gautam sits third from right end, this condition is not satisfied so rejected. Since, direction facing of Heena, Rohit and Gautam is not known, thus we can’t determine required result. Hence, statement I is not sufficient. From II: We have: Person sitting immediate left of Rohit sits fourth to right of Jyoti, which means in case (1a) Rohit sits facing south and in case (1b) Rohit sits facing north. Gautam sits second to left of Hari, which means case (1a) is not valid. Based on above given information, we get following result: case-1b Since, direction of Heena and gautam is not known, thus result can’t be determined. Hence, statement II is not sufficient. From I and II: Based on above given statements we get: Case-1b Since, direction of Heena and Gautam is not known, thus result can’t be determined. Hence, statement I and II together are not sufficient.
Everyone I have shown my first two chapters to have given me glowing feedback.
...Unanimously
In order to save money for her upcoming trip, she decided to scrimp on groceries by buying only the bare essentials and cooking all her meals at home...
Select the option that can be used as a one-word substitute for the given group of words.
To walk aimlessly
I. In the House of Commons, an imported (A) to omit the fabric gloves and glove fabrics from the order which imposes (B) 33 and third per cent duty...
in a dangerous state because of not being safe or not being held in place firmly.
Cater
(i) The umpteen four-wheelers and six-wheelers maintained by the institutions cater to the needs of students.
(ii) Corrianders Resta...
Select the most appropriate option that can substitute the bold segment in the given sentence.
Not only is my brother intelligent though hard ...
The power or right to make judgments about the law, to arrest and punish criminals, etc.
Choose the incorrect SYNONYM of the highlighted word.
Books have the power to guide, comfort, and heal.