Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Given statements: Q > W > X; J > W; Z < X < P Conclusions: I. P > Z → True (as J > W > X > Z & P > X → P > X > Z → P > Z. So, this conclusion is correct.) II. J > Q → False (as J > W > X > Z & Q > W; thus no clear relation between J and Q could be inferred from the given data.) III. W < P → False (as J > W > X > Z; Q > W; P > X; thus clear relation between W and P cannot be determined.) Hence, conclusion I is correct.
According to the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 what does petty organized crime mean?
Which of the following does not find a mention as showing state of mind under Section 14 of the Act–
The State shall take steps to organize village panchayats and endow them with powers to function as__________.
A contract made by a trustee in excess of his powers or in breach of trust, under section 11 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 is ___________
As per the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 2008, a notice for appearance is issued to accused under which section?
Transfer of property act______________________.
What is the requisite quorum for the meeting of a private company?
Appeal against the decision of Director General under Foreign trade(Regulation and Development) Act lies to the