Question
Statements: Only Ear is Eye. No Hand is
Ear. Only a few Hands are Legs. Conclusion: I. Some Eyes can be Legs. II. Some Legs can be Ears. III. Some Hands are not Legs. In the question below there are three statements followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts.Solution
Only Ear is Eye → All Eye are Ear and Eye cannot have positive relation with anyone. Hence conclusion I does not follow. No Hand is Ear (E) → Conversion → No Ear is Hand (E) + Only a few Hand is Leg (I) → Some Leg are not Ear (O*) → Probable conclusion → Some Leg can be Ear (I). Hence conclusion II follows. Only a few Hand is Leg → Some Hand are not Leg (O) and Some Hand are Leg (I). Hence conclusion III follows.
When a person submits a proposal directly to the Board and receives approval, what must they do next?
Who shall constitute the Employees’ State Insurance Corporation under the Code on Social Security, 2020?
A public servant accepts money through a middleman. According to the PC Act, liability arises if:
As per the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Section 180, who has the authority to examine orally any person supposed to be acquainted with the facts...
The Article of a company may be altered by _____________
How many members are present in Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority?
When a partner exercises his authority in an emergency and protects the firm from loss then such act _____.
A sues B for Rs. 1000 and shows entries in his account book showing B to be indebted to him to this amount. This entry is
Who can be competent witness?
Which section of the Act excludes oral evidence when the terms of a contract have been reduced to writing?Â