Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
given statements: M $ K; K & N, N % R, R @ W After converting: M ≥ K, K > N, N ≤ R, R < W After combining: M ≥ K > N ≤ R < W Conclusion a → W & K → W > K There is no relation between W and K in the statement M ≥ K > N ≤ R < W so, it is not true. Conclusion b → K & W → K > W There is no relation between K and W in the statement M ≥ K > N ≤ R < W. So, it is not true. Conclusion c → M % R → M ≤ R There is no relation between M and R in the statement M ≥ K > N ≤ R < W. So, it is not true.
In the standard IS-LM model, an increase in Government spending (G) without changing taxes has
The distribution of heights of American women aged 18 to 24 is approximately normally distributed with a mean of 65.5 inches and standard deviation of 2...
According to John Maynard Keynes, which one of the following statements is correct for a closed economy operating at less than full employment level of ...
'Distributed Profits' is also known as:
If indirect taxes are subtracted and subsidies are added to Net Domestic Product at market price we get
Which policy tool is more effective under a fixed exchange rate regime according to the Mundell-Fleming Model?
If Mean is 39, Median is 40, what is the value of Mode?
The substitution effect for a commodity is
Which of the following is the best indicator of an economy's total borrowings?
If elasticity is ‘e’, and price of the product is B, MR=?