Question
Statements : T % W % B $ I @ LÂ Conclusions
: I. B * T II. L © B III. L * T In the following questions, the symbols @, ©, %, * and $ are used with the following meaning as illustrated below: ‘E © F’ means ‘E is not greater than F’. ‘E $ F’ means ‘E is not smaller than F’. ‘E @ F’ means ‘E is neither smaller than nor greater than F. ‘E * F’ means ‘E is neither equal to nor greater than F’. ‘E % F’ means ‘E is neither smaller than nor equal to F’. Now in each of the following questions, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the three conclusions I, II and III given below them is/are definitely true and give your answer accordinglyÂSolution
Combined Inequality: T > W > B ≥ I = L Decoded conclusion: I. B < T                        II. L ≤ B                III. L < T T > W > B ≥ I = L                                T > B. Hence conclusion I is true . T > W > B ≥ I = L                                B ≥ L. Hence conclusion II is true . T > W > B ≥ I = L                                T > L. Hence conclusion III is true .
What is the maximum period an Executive Magistrate may authorize the detention of an accused in custody?Â
If the quorum is not present within half-an-hour from the time appointed for holding a meeting of the company the meeting, if called by requisitionists ...
Evidence by a dumb witness in sign language must be given:
The question is whether A committed a crime at Mumbai on a certain day. The fact that on that day, A was at Trivandrum is relevant
The accounting rule in respect of loss arising due to insolvency of a Partner is dealt within the case of:
Pleadings should state:
As per the IRDA Act, 1999_______________ is the time period which is there as a bar on the future employment of members?
Insurance Regulatory Development Authority was setup on the recommendation of Malhotra Committee which was headed by __________________ and who was ____...
The interim resolution professional conducts the first meeting of the Committee of Creditors ________________
In which of the following cases can courts intervene in an arbitral proceeding?