Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
• Pointing towards C, G said, "he is the only son of my mother's only son-in-law". G's mother's son-in-law can be G's husband or G's sister's husband. Thus, C is either the son or nephew of G. • Pointing towards G a person said, "She is the only sister-in-law of E's father-in-law". • Pointing towards a person C said, "she is the only daughter of G's sister". G has a sister and a niece. Case 1: when C is the son of G In this case we get 9 members, hence the case is invalid. Also, G's mother cannot have 2 sons-in-law. Case 2: When C is G's nephew
E will be either wife of C or husband of G's niece • Pointing towards B a person said, "He is the father of my son's mother". B must be a male. Thus, the person speaking the statement will be G's sister's husband and B will be G's father. • F said, "I have 2 children and 2 grandchildren". F will be G's mother. • Pointing towards D, F said, "He is the son-in-law of H's grandfather". D will be G's sister's husband. H will be G's niece. As E is in the 3rd generation, A will be G's sister.
• A said, "My spouse has no daughter-in-law". Thus, E will be H's husband. Thus, the final family tree is as follows:
A was E's mother-in-law.
Statements: P % Q, P $ R, Q # S, R @ T
Conclusions:
I. R $ Q
II. S & T ...
Statements: M > Q ≥ U = O, S = U < R ≤ T
Conclusions :I. M < R II. T > O III. Q ≥ T
Statement: T < U; W ≤ V = U; I > V; X ≥ U
Conclusion:
I. I > X
II. X ≥ I
Statements: A < B = C < D, A > E = F ≥ G ≥ H > I
Conclusions:
I. D > I
II. E = I
Statements: K * D, D $ N, N % M, M © W
Conclusions: I.M % W II.M $ W III.N @ D�...
Statements:
P ≥ Q = R; S = T ≤ U ≥ P
Conclusion:
I. R < S
II. T ≤ Q
Statements: G > E < F; E = D > C; C = B < A
Conclusion:
I. B < F
II. G > A
Statements:
J © K * R, U % R $ Z
Conclusions:
I. Z $ J
II. U % K
III. U © J
Statement: P < Q; R ≥ S; R ≥ O; S > Q ≥ T
Conclusion:
I. Q > O
II. O > T
Statements:
P > Q < R; T ≤ U ≤ Q > S; V ≤ W < T
Conclusions:
I). P > V
II). T = S
III). R > V...