Question
 The following statements provide: Â
I. The incident was of a type that does not generally happen without negligence  II. It was caused by an instrumentality solely in defendant’s control  III. The plaintiff did not contribute to the causeSolution
All of the above 3 statements are conditions essential to prove Res Ipsa Loquitor Principle. The maxim res ipsa loquitur applies when the only inference from the facts is that the accident could not have occurred but for the defendant’s negligence.
Monthly income of P is Rs.16000 and his monthly savings is Rs.10500. If his monthly income is decreased by 25% and monthly expenditure is decreased by 1...
A spent 25% of his monthly income on study and 70% of the remaining on rent. If amount spent on rent is Rs. 2016, then find the amount spent on study
The ratio of the number of people in A and B Companies is 4:5. 70% and 72% of people in A and B Companies passed the interview, r...
Akshay, Vishal and Dipak purchased 2, 20 and 50 notebooks for a total of Rs 16, Rs 140 and Rs 400 respectively from a stationery shop. In his transactio...
Pawan has some money left after spending 20%, 15% and 30% of monthly salary on rent, electricity and shopping respectively. The remaining money with Paw...
P spends 22% of his salary on transportation, 30% on food, 15% on children’s education and 25% on medical. He deposits the remaining amount of Rs....
Ajit's monthly income is Rs. 58,000, while Sujit's monthly income is Rs. 54,000. Sujit spends 82% of his income, and Ajit spends 77% of his income. Cal...
The respective ratio of monthly income of A to monthly income of B is 11:12, and A’s saving is (100/17)% more than B’s saving. Find the expenditure ...
The marks scored by a boy in three subjects are in the ratio 2 : 3 : 5. Boy scored an overall aggregate of 60% in the exam. If the maximum marks in each...
5% of a = b, then b% of 20 is the same as __________.
