Question

The following statements provide:
I. The incident was of a type that does not generally happen without negligence
II. It was caused by an instrumentality solely in defendant’s control
III. The plaintiff did not contribute to the cause

Q: Answer- The following statements provide: I. The incident was of a type that does not genera...

All of the above 3 statements are conditions essential to prove Res Ipsa Loquitor Principle. The maxim res ipsa loquitur applies when the only inference from the facts is that the accident could not have occurred but for the defendants negligence.

A Exceptions to principle of negligence.

B Conditions essential for Res Ipsa Loquitor principle.

C Exceptions to principle of nuisance.

D I & II are Exceptions to principle of Res Ipsa Loquitor principle and III is an essential.

E I & III are Limitations for Res Ipsa Loquitor principle, II is an essential.

Practice Next

More Section Tests Legal Questions

Any fact from which, either by itself or in connection with other facts, the existence, non-existence, nature or extent of any right, liability or disabili...
Which of the following is an exception to harbouring a deserter as an offence?
As per Section 149 (1) of the Companies Act 2013, Every company shall have a Board of Directors consisting of individuals as directors and shall have a min...
If a person who is identifying the accused is mentally disabled____.
Certified copy of a Judgment is which kind of evidence?
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 lays down that whoever commits organised crime shall if such offence has resulted in the death of any person, be punished...
Amit agrees to supply milk daily to Kailash, while Kailash agrees to pay the price of milk every month. Both these are ________________ reciprocal promises
Abetment of abetment is:
What kind of a presumption lies in favour of a power of attorney?
Proof of contents of documents can be proved by:

Hey! Ask a query

The following statements provide:
I. The incident was of a type that does not generally happen without negligence
II. It was caused by an instrumentality solely in defendant’s control
III. The plaintiff did not contribute to the cause

Detailed Solution

More Section Tests Legal Questions

Hey! Ask a query

Please Register/Login

The following statements provide: I. The incident was of a type that does not generally happen without negligence II. It was caused by an instrumentality solely in defendant’s control III. The plaintiff did not contribute to the cause

Detailed Solution

More Section Tests Legal Questions

Hey! Ask a query

Please Register/Login

The following statements provide:
I. The incident was of a type that does not generally happen without negligence
II. It was caused by an instrumentality solely in defendant’s control
III. The plaintiff did not contribute to the cause