‘What cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly.’ This doctrine relates to
The Doctrine of Colourable Legislation is founded on the Latin maxim “Quando aliquid prohibetur ex directo, prohibetur et per obliquum” which states that whatever is unable to be done directly, cannot also be done indirectly. The doctrine of colourability is the idea that when a legislature wants to do something that it cannot do within the constraints of the Constitution, it colours the law with a substitute purpose, allowing it to accomplish its original goal. The scope of the doctrine is well-explained by the Supreme Court in the matter of K.C Gajapati Narayan Deo vs. State of Orissa 1953
If BAG = 217 and GATE = 71205, then BAKERY =
Select the related number from the given alternatives:
12 : 39 :: ? : 57
Select the option that is related to the third term in the same way as the second term is related to the first term.
PLOT : KOLG :: FIGS : ?
Select the option that is related to fourth number in the same way as the first number is related to the second number and the fifth number is related t...
Select the option that is related to the third number in the same way as the second number is related to first number and the sixth number is related to...
Select the set in which the numbers are related in the same way as are the numbers of the following set.
(NOTE: Operations should be performed on...
Thick : Thin :: Idle : _________
If 76 + 65 = 2, 72 + 73 = 9, then 84 + 82 = ?
If ‘A’ denotes ‘addition’, ‘B’ denotes ‘multiplication’, ‘C’ denotes ‘subtraction’, and ‘D’ denotes ‘division’, then wh...
Select the option in which the pair of letter-clusters share the same relationship as that shared by the given pair of letter-clusters.
PRAWN : LUYPN :: ?