Question
‘What cannot be done directly cannot be done
indirectly.’ This doctrine relates toSolution
The Doctrine of Colourable Legislation is founded on the Latin maxim “Quando aliquid prohibetur ex directo, prohibetur et per obliquum” which states that whatever is unable to be done directly, cannot also be done indirectly. The doctrine of colourability is the idea that when a legislature wants to do something that it cannot do within the constraints of the Constitution, it colours the law with a substitute purpose, allowing it to accomplish its original goal. The scope of the doctrine is well-explained by the Supreme Court in the matter of K.C Gajapati Narayan Deo vs. State of Orissa 1953
According to CPC no Court shall proceed with the trial of any suit____________
When can the Central Government levy protective duties as per section 6 of the Customs Tariff Act?
What are the characteristics or features of the extent of the absolute liability rule as mentioned?
Which type of share is issued by a company to its existing shareholders without receipt of any consideration from shareholders for issuance of such share?
According to the PFRDA Act, to which entities does the Act apply?
What is the main difference between civil law and common law legal systems?
Under Section 3 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act  the relevant legal provision, how is the receipt of written communications determined unless othe...
Under the IRDA Act the Authority shall have the duty to_________________
Why the Constitution is considered the supreme law of the land in India?
Under what circumstances can the Authority make a lease of the premises of an airport, as per the Airports Authority of India Act?
