Question
In the landmark case Krishan v. State of Haryana (2013),
the Supreme Court addressed the admissibility and evidentiary value of dying declarations under what was then Section 32 of the IEA (now Section 26 of BSA). The Court held that: Which principle regarding dying declarations was established in Krishan v. State of Haryana?Solution
Krishan v. State of Haryana established the principle that while dying declarations are admissible under Section 26 of BSA (previously Section 32 IEA), they do not carry absolute credibility and must be corroborated in essential details by other evidence before forming the sole basis of conviction. The judgment emphasized that the solemn nature of dying statements requires Courts to treat them with caution and cross-verify them with other corroborating evidence. This principle balances the exception to hearsay rules with the requirement of fair trial and reliability of evidence. The decision also clarified that dying declarations can be made to anyone (including police) and admissibility is not contingent upon consciousness of imminent death as per Section 26(a) of BSA.
Which of the following districts of Uttar Pradesh has benefited from “Gandak Project”?
I. Gorakhpur...
In the parliamentary dignitaries is included:
1. Speaker of Lok Sabha
2. Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha
3. General Secretary of Lok Sa...
Who among the following was the first female astronaut from India?
What was India's estimated GDP growth for FY24 by the National Statistical Office?
'World No Tobacco Day' is observed on -
Production of silk originated in:
Next QUAD Summit 2023 will be held at which place?
Foodpanda’s Indian business has been recently acquired by
Which of the following statements are true regarding the 2023 global climate report?
1. The average global temperature has risen by 1.1°C compar...
Which among the following banks is headquartered in Kerala, India?