Question
In the landmark case Krishan v. State of Haryana (2013),
the Supreme Court addressed the admissibility and evidentiary value of dying declarations under what was then Section 32 of the IEA (now Section 26 of BSA). The Court held that: Which principle regarding dying declarations was established in Krishan v. State of Haryana?Solution
Krishan v. State of Haryana established the principle that while dying declarations are admissible under Section 26 of BSA (previously Section 32 IEA), they do not carry absolute credibility and must be corroborated in essential details by other evidence before forming the sole basis of conviction. The judgment emphasized that the solemn nature of dying statements requires Courts to treat them with caution and cross-verify them with other corroborating evidence. This principle balances the exception to hearsay rules with the requirement of fair trial and reliability of evidence. The decision also clarified that dying declarations can be made to anyone (including police) and admissibility is not contingent upon consciousness of imminent death as per Section 26(a) of BSA.
A high bounce rate on a loan landing page suggests weakness in:
The use by marketers of YouTube, Twitter, and Instagram to promote their brands or organizations is known as ___________.
Organizations attempt to reduce the inconsistency in the delivery of services through:
Which of the following is most likely to increase CASA ratio?
Which of the following is an attribute of selling?
When marketers decide to use surveys to ask questions, they make each of the following assumptions EXCEPT:
When demand is more than the supply, it is known as _______ demand.
Which stage of the Product Life Cycle requires heavy promotional expenditure?
A bank launches a youth-focused savings account with cashback on online gaming and streaming subscriptions. This is an example of:
Which of the following statements is true about Facebook?