Question
In the landmark case Krishan v. State of Haryana (2013),
the Supreme Court addressed the admissibility and evidentiary value of dying declarations under what was then Section 32 of the IEA (now Section 26 of BSA). The Court held that: Which principle regarding dying declarations was established in Krishan v. State of Haryana?Solution
Krishan v. State of Haryana established the principle that while dying declarations are admissible under Section 26 of BSA (previously Section 32 IEA), they do not carry absolute credibility and must be corroborated in essential details by other evidence before forming the sole basis of conviction. The judgment emphasized that the solemn nature of dying statements requires Courts to treat them with caution and cross-verify them with other corroborating evidence. This principle balances the exception to hearsay rules with the requirement of fair trial and reliability of evidence. The decision also clarified that dying declarations can be made to anyone (including police) and admissibility is not contingent upon consciousness of imminent death as per Section 26(a) of BSA.
Who was the founder of Kashi Vidyapith?
The term 'Green Revolution' is associated with which agricultural scientist
Which bank recorded the highest growth rate in total business among PSBs in FY24?
Recently Supreme Court formed an expert committee to investigate Adani group cases, who will be the head the committee?
Social justice is the guiding principle of which of the following labour legislations?Β
The Union Cabinet allocated Rs 12,461 crore for which sector in the revised scheme running from FY 2024-25 to FY 2031-32?
How much funding has been allocated for the RAMP Scheme over a period of five years?
Which constitutional amendment introduced the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in India?
Who has been appointed as the interim Prime Minister of the country Mali?
Who has been awarded with the Ezhuthachan award 2022?