Question
An ED officer, while investigating a money laundering case, discovers that proceeds of crime have been transferred to a third party who had no knowledge of the illicit origin. The third party claims to be a bona fide purchaser for value. Under PMLA, which statements are correct? Statement 1: The property cannot be attached because the third party is innocent. Statement 2: The property remains liable for attachment as proceeds of crime, but the third party may claim equitable relief. Statement 3: The third party can claim immunity if they were unaware of the illicit source. Statement 4: Only the original offender can be prosecuted; the third party cannot be prosecuted unless they actively participated in money laundering. Which statements are correct?
More Other Laws and Acts Questions
- As per Section 39 of the Contract Act 1872, when a party to a contract has refused to perform the contract, in its entirety, what shall be the outcome?
- For how long must a reporting entity maintain records of transactions under the PMLA?
- A wishes to prove, by secondary evidence, the contents of a lost document.
- Copies made from original by mechanical process are?
- Provisions of longer period in the matter of accumulation of property under sec 17 of T.P. Act amounts to:
- A MANDATORY INJUNCTION under Section 39 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 compels a party to:
- When did Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 received the assent from President
- Which one of the following is not the activity of BIS
- Section 19 of PMLA deals with:
- Section 48(1) of the BNSS, 2023 provides that information regarding the arrest and place of detention shall be given—
Relevant for Exams:
Hey! Ask a query
Please enter email id
The email must be a valid email address.
Please enter Mobile Number
Please enter valid Mobile Number
Please enter your Doubt
Think You're Ready for RBI Grade B?
RBI Grade B 2026 Phase 1 Memory Based Paper
- 200 Questions with Detailed Solutions
- Section-wise Coverage (GA, English, Quant & Reasoning)