Question
A person receives Rs. 50 lakhs through a bank transfer from an undisclosed source. Investigation reveals that the source had committed a forgery (Section 463 IP
- C . The person intends to use this money to purchase immovable property. Under the PMLA, 2002, which statements are correct? Statement 1: Money cannot be termed proceeds of crime because forgery is not listed in the Schedule to PMLA. Statement 2: If this money is being used to invest in real estate, the property would be liable for attachment under Section 5 of PMLA. Statement 3: The Enforcement Directorate can initiate action only if a First Information Report is filed for forgery by a police officer. Statement 4: The person's possession of such money itself constitutes an offence under Section 3 of PMLA if they know it is proceeds of crime from a scheduled offence. Which statements are correct?
More Other Laws and Acts Questions
- According to Sales of Goods Act, 1930 Where there is an unconditional contract for the sale of specific goods in a deliverable state,
- According to Section 78, which of the following is NOT a valid defence against the charge of stalking?
- What does "service" include according to the definition?
- Which case is known as Post-Master Case?
- The president shall hold office for a term of 5 years from___________.
- When there is a conflict between 2 statutes which rule to apply?
- As per the Sale of Goods Act, the term "fault" is defined as:
- The concept that a principal is bound by the acts of his agent performed within the scope of authority is represented by which legal maxim_________________...
- According to section 5 of the RERA what action must the Authority take upon receiving an application under section 4 of the Act?
- An absconder’s property is sold after how many months after attachment of his property?
Relevant for Exams:
Hey! Ask a query
Please enter email id
The email must be a valid email address.
Please enter Mobile Number
Please enter valid Mobile Number
Please enter your Doubt
