Question
Dr. M enters into a written contract with Mr. N to
provide full-time medical care and nursing assistance to N's elderly mother, Mrs. O, who suffers from advanced Alzheimer's disease and is completely bedridden and dependent. The contract explicitly specifies that Dr. M shall reside at Mrs. O's residence and provide continuous care. After six months, Dr. M suddenly abandons the position without providing notice or replacement care, leaving Mrs. O unattended for 36 hours until family discovered the abandonment. Mrs. O suffered falls and injury during this period. Which of the following correctly applies Section 357 of the BNS?Solution
Explanation: Section 357 of the BNS, 2023 provides: "Whoever, being bound by a lawful contract to attend on or to supply the wants of any person who, by reason of youth, or of mental illness, or of a disease or bodily weakness, is helpless or incapable of providing for his own safety or of supplying his own wants, voluntarily omits so to do, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three months, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or with both." The section creates a criminal liability (distinct from mere civil breach of contract) for abandonment of helpless persons in specific circumstances. Essential elements include: (i) a lawful contract; (ii) the contracted person is helpless due to specified reasons (youth, mental illness, disease, bodily weakness); (iii) the bound person voluntarily omits care. In Dr. M's case: (i) there is an explicit written contract; (ii) Mrs. O is helpless due to Alzheimer's disease and is bedridden; (iii) Dr. M voluntarily abandoned care. This satisfies all Section 357 elements. The provision does not require proof of resulting injury to establish liability (option A is incorrect), does not provide exemptions for medical professionals (option C is incorrect), and does not require comparative negligence analysis (option D is incorrect). The presence or absence of abandonment clauses in the contract does not determine applicability (option E is incorrect). Thus, option (B) correctly applies Section 357
A shopkeeper made a profit of 26% by selling an article for Rs. 2520. If he had sold it after allowing a discount of 20% on its selling price, then find...
Rajesh purchased 10 books, 30 copies, and 20 files, respectively for Rs 2000, Rs 1500, and Rs 1200 respectively from the whole sale shop. By selling eac...
Roshan purchased 100 rolls of paper for Rs. 32 per roll. He spent Rs. 450 on their transportation. He also paid 20 paise per roll for packing of each ro...
A shopkeeper sold an article after giving a discount of 20% and made a profit of Rs.40. Find the difference between the marked price and selling price o...
A and B together started a business with initial investment in the ratio of 3:5, respectively. The time-period of investment for A and B is in the ratio...
A boy buys a lipstick for Rs. 235 and sells it Rs. 141. Find his loss percent.  Â
A trader bought an article for Rs. 3600 and marked it 20% above of its cost price. If he sold it after giving a discount of Rs. 180 then find the profit...
A bag of cost price of Rs. 9000 is marked up by a certain percentage, and a discount percent of twice the markup percent is offered on it. If there is a...
A person buys two items A and B. Item A costs Rs. 5 more than twice the cost of item B. If the total cost of both items is Rs. 95, find the cost of item B.
Devesh sells his car to Pranav at a profit of 20% who sells it to Hemraj at a loss of 20%. Hemraj, after finding some scratches in the car, returns it t...