Under Section 18 of the Securities Contracts

Solution

Explanation: Section 18(1) of SCRA provides: "Nothing contained in sections 13, 14, 15 and 17 shall apply to spot delivery contracts." This creates a blanket exemption for spot delivery contracts from the stringent regulation applicable to forward/derivative contracts. However, Section 18(2) significantly qualifies this exemption: "Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), if the Central Government is of opinion that in the interest of the trade or in the public interest it is expedient to regulate and control the business of dealing in spot delivery contracts also in any State or area (whether section 13 has been declared to apply to that State or area or not), it may, by notification in the Official Gazette, declare that the provisions of section 17 shall also apply to such State or area in respect of spot delivery contracts generally or in respect of spot delivery contracts for the sale or purchase of such securities as may be specified in the notification..." The statutory design reflects the original 1956 parliamentary intent: spot delivery contracts were exempted as they represent genuine commercial transactions requiring minimal regulation. However, recognizing that forward transactions could be disguised as spot transactions to evade regulation, Section 18(2) grants the Central Government discretionary power to impose Section 17 controls (relating to member dealing restrictions and exchange regulations) if public interest warrants. In P's case:  If the Central Government has issued a Section 18(2) notification for that State, Section 17's provisions apply even to P's spot delivery transaction. P must comply with Section 17's requirement that members deal only within recognized exchange framework. If no Section 18(2) notification exists, P's spot delivery contract remains exempt. Thus, option (B) correctly applies Section 18's conditional exemption framework and the override mechanism under Section 18(2)