Question
What constitutes defamation under the Bharatiya Nyaya
Sanhita?Solution
Explanation: Section 356 Defamation: (1) Whoever, by words either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations, makes or publishes in any manner, any imputation concerning any person intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person, is said, except in the cases hereinafter excepted, to defame that person.
Statement: N < M; G ≤ V = M; J > V; K ≥ M
Conclusion:
I. J > K
II. K ≥ J
Statements: F > T = O > E < P ≤ X > H < M
Conclusion I: F ≥ E
II: X > E
Statements: Q % R & L @ T $ D; W % Q # P
Conclusions : I. D % R II. Q % L I...
Statements:
R ≤ A ≤ B > C = X < J < K = L
Conclusions: I. R ≤ B II. L > C ...
Statements: I = E ≥ A; L ≥ K ≥ B ≥ M ≥ E
Conclusions:
I. B ≥ I
II. I < L
III. K ≥ A
What will come in place of blank in following below such that both P @ S and V % R are definitely true?
P $ Q @ R _ S $ T © U $ V
i) @ ...
Statements: M @ N % Z # C & B $ A # E; W $ Z @ C
Conclusions : I. E @ Z II. A # W ...
In the question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the conclusion (s) among given three conclusions is /are definitely true and ...
In this question, the statement is followed by two conclusions. Which of the two conclusion(s) is/are true?
Statement: Z < L < P = V ≥ H = U �...
Statements: Q > W > X; J > W; Z < X < P
Conclusions:
I. P > Z
II. J > Q
III. W < P
