Question

Under the Contract Act where one party promises to perform an act that they knew, or could have known with reasonable diligence, to be impossible or unlawful, while the promisee was unaware of this fact, what is the promisor's obligation if the act is not performed?

A The promisor has no obligation to compensate the promisee, as the contract is void from the outset
B The promisor must compensate the promisee for any loss sustained due to the non-performance, regardless of the promisor's knowledge of the impossibility or unlawfulness
C The promisor is required to compensate the promisee only if the promisee can prove that the non-performance directly caused them significant financial loss
D The promisor must make compensation to the promisee for any loss sustained due to the non-performance, since the promisor knew or ought to have known about the impossibility or unlawfulness, while the promisee did not
E The promisor is only liable to compensate the promisee if the impossibility or unlawfulness arose after the contract was formed.
Practice Next

Hey! Ask a query