Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Shreya Singhal v. Union of India is a judgement by a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India in 2015, on the issue of online speech and intermediary liability in India. The Supreme Court struck down Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 , relating to restrictions on online speech, as unconstitutional on grounds of violating the freedom of speech guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India . The Court further held that the Section was not saved by virtue of being a 'reasonable restriction' on the freedom of speech under Article 19(2).
A person invested ₹15000 in a scheme for 3 years at 8% compound interest, compounded annually. After 3 years, the person decided to withdraw the amoun...
Rs. (3y + 600) is invested at 40% p.a. compound interest, compounded annually for 2 years, and earns an interest of Rs. (4y - 1200). Determine the value...
A Bank came up with an interesting investment plan under which it would offer 6% interest compounded half-yearly. Mr. 'X' deposited ₹ 80000 once at th...
The compound interest on a sum of money for 3 years is 7,280. The sum amounts to 17,280 in 3 years. What is the rate of interest compounded annually?
The interest on 24,000 in a year compounded annually when the rates are 8% p.a. and 10% p.a. for two successive years is:
Raj and Simran each invested a sum of ₹10,000 for three years at 25% compound interest per annum. However, while for Raj the interest was compounded a...
A sum of ₹10000 is invested at compound interest for 2 years. If the interest rate is 5% per annum, what is the total amount after 2 years?
Michael has read 3/4 of a book, while Anna has read only 2/3 of the book she is reading. Both, however, have another 90 pages of their respective books...
The compound interest on a certain sum in 2.5 years at 10% p.a., interest compounded yearly, is 1,623. The sum is: