Question
Which of the following cases does not explain the maxim
‘Damnum Sine Injuria’?Solution
In the case of Bhim Singh Vs. State of J and K, the principle of Injuria Sine Damnum was applied. In this instance, Bhim Singh was a member of the J&k State Legislative Assembly who was detained by state police while on his way to a legislative assembly vote and detained indefinitely without charge. His wife filed a Habeas Corpus petition to gain his malafide release. The apex Court determined MLA Bhim Singh’s democratic right & awarded him Rs. 50,000 in compensatory losses. In addition, the appropriate police official was penalized for neglect of duty and misconduct.
What does resolution plan mean?
Which of the following is correct about altering the boundaries of any State?
Which of the following is an exception to S.132?
Under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 2A deems a dispute as "Industrial Dispute" automatically if:
Under the SARFAESI Act, 2002, the "Secured Creditor" refers to:
How may a conciliator communicate with the parties in a conciliation process?
Under Section 2(ac) of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956, which of the following is EXCLUDED from the definition of "Derivatives"?
The mortgagor ostensibly sells the mortgaged property in-
Section 221 provides that for offences under Section 67 BNSS where the parties are married—
According to Sale of Goods Act, 1930 “goods”
Relevant for Exams:
