Question
In which of the following cases Supreme Court held that
"Test identification parade is only an aid to investigation. The practice is not born out of prudence"?Solution
The case of Sidhartha Vashisht vs state (NCT of Delhi) famously known as Jessica lal murder case. The whole case relied upon circumstantial evidence which was established by the facts of the case. Shivaji v. Nagendra, AIR 2010 SC 2261: Whether examination of all witnesses cited in the complaint is sine qua non for taking cognizance by a Magistrate in a case exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions
Whoever, being a public servant, and being legally bound as such public servant, not to purchase or bid for certain property, purchases or bids for that...
The term Lis Pendens refers to ______________
Section 8 prohibits handling hazardous substances except in compliance with procedural safeguards. Which of the following matches the statutory intent?ďż˝...
The famous case of Balfour vs. Balfour (1919) 2 KB 571 is related to________.
Under Section 47 of the LLP Act, 2008, the determination of disputes between partners of an LLP must be decided within a period of:Â
Investigation under the PC Act can be conducted by officers not below which rank?Â
Under the PMLA, who is responsible for maintaining records of all transactions and furnishing information to the Financial Intelligence Unit – India (...
When a fact is a “conclusive proof”, the Court__________.
What does the principle of novus actus interveniens refer to in tort law?
Whether photographed words are considered as documents as per the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?
