Question
The burden of proof that the case of accused comes
within exception is on theSolution
Section 105 of Evidence Act Burden of proving that case of accused comes within exceptions. ––When a person is accused of any offence, the burden of proving the existence of circumstances bringing the case within any of the General Exceptions in the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), or within any special exception or proviso contained in any other part of the same Code, or in any law defining the offence, is upon him, and the Court shall presume the absence of such circumstances. Illustrations (a) A, accused of murder, alleges that, by reason of unsoundness of mind, he did not know the nature of the act. The burden of proof is on A.
Statements: S * C, C $ T, T # U, U % V
Conclusions :
I.V # T
II. C % U
III. S # U
IV. C % V <...
Statements:
F > L = P ≥ Q ≥ W; X < C ≤ D < W
Conclusions:
I. W > X
II. F > C
Statement: Q > P; R > S > O; R < P
Conclusion:
I.Q > O
II. Q > S
Statements: X = P ≥ M; M > M > I > L; P < L < G
Conclusions:
I. G > I
II. X ≥ L
III. L < L
Statement: J > K; N < O ≤ L; N ≥ M > K
Conclusion:
I. N ≥ J
II. K < L
Statements: S * K, T $ K, K @ B
Conclusions:
a) S $ B
b) S @ B
In the following question the relationship between different elements is given in the statements followed by three conclusions I, II and III. Read the...
If “M % N # O © P @ S © T $ W” is true then which of the following is definitely not true?
(i) M # P
(ii) O © T
(iii) N #...
Which of the following symbols should be placed in the blank spaces, respectively (in the same order from left to right ) in order to complete the given...
Statements: 21 < 51 = 71 ≤ 61 < 11; 32 < 81 ≤ 91 =51
Conclusions:
I. 11 > 81
II. 21 > 32
III. 32 ≥ 21
