Question
Limit of quantity for the possession of intoxicant has
been provided in which section of Chhattisgarh Excise Act?Solution
Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1915 S. 16. Possession of intoxicants generally. - (1) The State Government may, by notification, prescribe a limit of quantity for the possession of any intoxicant: Provided that different limits may be prescribed for different qualities of the same article. (2) No person shall have in his possession any quantity of any intoxicant in excess of the limit prescribed under sub-section (1), except under the authority and in accordance with the terms and conditions of - (a) a licence for the manufacture, cultivation, collection, sale, or supply of such intoxicant, or  (b) a pass for the import, export or transport of such intoxicant, or  (c) a permit granted under this Act  (3) Sub-section (2) shall not apply to any foreign liquor - (a) which is in the possession of any common carrier or warehouseman as such. (4) Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing sub-sections, the State Government may, by notification, prohibit the possession by any person or class of persons, either in the State or in any specified area, of any intoxicant, either absolutely, or subject to such conditions as it may prescribe. Â
Which of the following are the requisites of a valid adoption?
Service of Summons to a defendant has to be made within _____ days of institution of a suit?
As per Section 2(ll) of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 superannuation in relation to an employee, who is the me...
Which of the following is not correct with respect to wagering agreement?
Article 14 of Indian Constitution does not prohibit
Which of the following is true about the concept of "mahr" in Muslim Personal Law?
The age limit for driving a vehicle in a public place is?
A, in India, instigates B, a foreigner in Goa, to commit a murder in Goa. What offence has A committed?
The question is, whether A and B, were married. The fact that they were usually received and treated by their friends as husband and wife, is relevant. ...
The landmark judgment in Navtej Singh Johar & Ors. V. Union of India related to