Get Started with ixamBee
Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
In Hardeep Singh vs. State of Punjab (2014) 3 SCC 92 the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that the power to issue summons under section 319 Cr.P.C. vests with the magistrate at the stage when the trial begins i.e. at the stage when charge sheet u/s 173(2) of Cr.P.C. is filed before the trial court after which the court take cognizance and frame charges. Hon'ble Supreme Court in Hardeep Singh vs. State of Punjab (Supra) held that power under Section 319 CrPC can be exercised at the stage of completion of examination-in-chief and the court does not need to wait till the said evidence is tested on cross-examination for it is the satisfaction of the court which can be gathered from the reasons recorded by the court, in respect of complicity of some other person(s), not facing the trial in the offence.
What is the punishment for tampering with computer source documents under section 65 of the Information Technology Act, 2000?
Which principle has been discussed in the case of M.S.M Sharma Vs. Shri Krishna Sinha 1960.
A precept can be issued___.
“On whom does the burden of proof lie”. This is discussed in Section ……. Of Indian Evidence Act
Which of the following is not a duty of the buyer?
S. 13 of the Code of Civil procedure provides that a foreign judgment is:
A government company is a company in which __________% of the paid up share capital is held by the central government, or by any state government
'Obligation' under Section 2 of the Specific Relief Act 1963 means:
Under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 where a complaint is received by an Adjudicating Authority that any person has committed an offence u...
How often is the appropriate government required to review and revise the minimum rates of wages under the Minimum Wages Act?
