Question
Which of the following is not common in both Res
Judicata and Res sub judice?Solution
Res Sub Judice does not bar former suit or any suit. It just stays the suit filed subsequent to the former suit.
Statements: L ≥ R, U ≤ N, N < M > I
Conclusion:
I. R > I
II. M ≥ U
Statements: K = L ≥ Q; P < R ≤ S = Q; T = U ≤ P
Conclusions:
I. K > R
II. T < QIn the question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the following conclusion(s) among the three conclusions is/are definitely true...
Statements: Â P * R, M & N, R $ M
Conclusions:Â Â Â Â Â a) P @ MÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â b) P $ M
...Statements: G > H = M; N < R = H; S > R
Conclusions:
I. S > M
II. G < S
III. N > G
Statements:
E ≤ A > J ≥ L; Y > J < D
Conclusions:
I. D > L
II. A > L
Statements: C % K, K @ L, L & U, U $ G
Conclusions: I.G @ L II. C @ L III. C @ G
...Statements: Y ≥ Q ≥ P = T; T ≤ H < O; O > I
Conclusions:
I. P ≥ O
II. I > P
III. T < Y
Statement: Z > T ≥ K; Z ≤ S = J; I > T
Conclusion:
I. J > K
II. I > S
In which of the following expressions will the expression ‘S > Y’ and ‘R > Y be definitely true?