📢 Too many exams? Don’t know which one suits you best? Book Your Free Expert 👉 call Now!


    Question

    Regarding the testimony of an accomplice under Section

    138 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, which of the following statements represents the MOST significant change from the corresponding Section 133 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?
    A Section 138 declares for the first time that an accomplice is a competent witness against an accused person Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    B Section 138 now states that "a conviction is not illegal if it proceeds upon the corroborated testimony of an accomplice," changing the word from "uncorroborated" in the old Act Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    C Section 138 prohibits conviction based solely on accomplice testimony even if the court finds the testimony entirely trustworthy Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    D Illustration (b) to Section 119 of BSA has been completely deleted, removing the rule of prudence regarding accomplice testimony Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    E Section 138 allows the testimony of one accomplice to be corroborated solely by the testimony of another accomplice Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

    Solution

    The MOST significant change in Section 138 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 is the modification of the word from "uncorroborated " in Section 133 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 to "corroborated " in the new provision. The old Section 133 stated: "a conviction is not illegal merely because it proceeds upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice." The new Section 138 states: "a conviction is not illegal if it proceeds upon the corroborated testimony of an accomplice." This change, combined with the retention of Illustration (b) to Section 119 (which states that accomplices are unworthy of credit unless corroborated), has transformed the corroboration requirement from a "rule of prudence " to a "rule of law ." This means that mandatory corroboration is now a legal requirement, not merely a cautionary guideline. The change was made after the Parliamentary Standing Committee noted a contradiction between the provisions and recommended modifications to ensure clarity.

    Practice Next
    ask-question