Question
As per Explanation 5 of Section 46, in abetment by
conspiracy, which of the following is not necessary?Solution
Explanation 5 of Section 46  says that it is not necessary  for the abettor to concert  the offence with the actual offender. It is sufficient  if the abettor engages in the conspiracy in pursuance of which the offence is committed .
In expression ‘S & T $ U # V @ W & Y $ Z’ how is Z related to U?Â
If J & I @ H + G is true then, how is G related to J?
A @ B' means 'A is the father of B'. 'A % B' means 'A is the wife of B'. 'A $ B' means 'A is the son of B'. 'A & B' means 'A is the sister of B'. If 'R ...
Statements : R < Q ≤ T > S = V, D < F ≤ Q
Conclusions : I. T > D II. F < R
If ‘W#U#T?R*S’ is true then how is T related to W?
If ‘J % K & L @ H # I % G’ is true, then how is G related to K?
If ‘E # F + D + A * B & C’ is true, then how is D related to C?
‘M $ K’ means ‘M is the mother of K’.
‘M # K’ means ‘M is the father of K’.
‘M @ K’ means ‘M is the husband of K’....
- A@B means A is married to B. A#B means B is mother of A. A$B means B is son of A. A!B means B is brother of A. If Q @ P # R @ S # T @ U $ V ! W and gender ...
If "G @ P & I % W & V # Q & K * M" is definitely true, then how is W related to K?
Relevant for Exams:
