Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
In the case of Krishna Texport & Capital Markets Ltd. vs.Ila A. Agrawal & Ors[1]..The Honorable Supreme Court of India in its attempt to clarify the issues pertaining to Section 138 of the Act overruled the judgment of the Division Bench of Madras High Court in B. Raman & Ors. Vs. M/s. Shasun Chemicals and Drugs Ltd., wherein it was concluded by the Honorable High Court that the service of Notice as envisaged under Section 138 to all the Directors and persons concerned is a mandatory obligation before a complaint could be filed against any wrong committed on their part. Further, it was added by the Honorable High Court that a non- compliance of such a mandatory requisite would outlaw the legal proceedings of any kind against the Directors. The Honorable Supreme Court while deciding the question whether the notice under Section 138 of the Act is mandatorily required to be sent to the directors of a Company before a complaint could be filed against such directors along with the Company observed that the there is nothing in Section 138 of the NI Act which may even remotely suggest issuance of notice to anyone other than the drawer. The Honorable Supreme Court went through the interpretation of the Sections 138 and 141. While interpreting the Section 141 of the Act, the Supreme Court explained that plain reading of Section 141 of the Act provides that if the person committing an offence under Section 138 is a Company, every director of such Company who was in charge of and responsible for its affairs and who guided actions to that Company for conduct of its business shall also be deemed to be vicariously liable as company is a juristic entity. Section 141 of the Act does not provide any requirement to send notices separately to the directors.
Person P allocated 35% of his salary to his son for school fees. From the remaining amount, he saved 40% in his bank account. The...
The stock of rice in a shop has increased by 25%. What percentage of the stock of rice should be sold so that the stock again becomes as much as it was ...
In an examination, Ankita scored 58%, Namita scored 88%, and Minakshi scored 642 marks. Ankita's marks were 522. What is the average marks scored by all...
In a hospital, the ratio of nurses to doctors is 5:2. 30% of nurses and 40% of doctors are working in the emergency department, and 20% of the remaining...
The value of A’s car is depreciating by 36% every year whereas the value of his house is appreciating by 15% each year as compared to the previous yea...
A gave 40% of amount to B. B gave 30% of amount received from A to C. If amount received by C from B is Rs.144, then find the amount received by B from A.
There were two candidate in an election. 15% of the total voters did not cast their votes whereas 10% of the casting votes were declared invalid. If the...
A candidate just passed by getting 25 answers correct by attempting 60 of the total questions. Find the total number of questions in the examination if ...
A laptop with a list price of Rs. 50,000 is available at Rs. 28,000 after two successive discounts. If the second discount is 10%, find the first discou...