Get Started with ixamBee
Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
In Mithu vs State of Punjab, a five-Judge Bench of the SC struck down Section 303 of the IPC, holding that the provision violated Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. As per Section 303, if a person undergoing life imprisonment committed murder, they would mandatorily be sentenced to death. The SC held that the provision drew an arbitrary distinction between persons committing murder and persons undergoing life imprisonment who committed murder. There was no rationale behind this distinction. Further, a mandatory death sentence prevents courts from exercising their discretion.
Statement: M>T≤Z; T>Q ; X ≥R>Q
I. X ≥ M
II. Q< M
Statements: D > C ≥ A ≤ B = F, G ≤ K < L < C
Conclusion:
I. D > G
II. C > G
III. K ≤ B
Statements: Z > V = J; V > I; A ≤ D ≤ F = Z
Conclusions:
I. V < D
II. F > J
III. J > I
Statements: Z = Y ≥ X > W, Q > O = P ≥ I, W ≥ V ≥ U = Q
Conclusions:
I. Z ≥ Q
II. I ≤ W
III. X > P
Statements:
P < S < L = Y; H < X < E < T = L > K
Conclusion:
I. K > P
II. X < Y
Statements: K > L ≥ M > N, N < O < P = J
Conclusion:
I. K ≥ O
II. P > L
III. L > J
Statements: K = L ≥ Q; P < R ≤ S = Q; T = U ≤ P
Conclusions:
I. K > R
II. T < Q
In the question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the conclusion (s) among given three conclusions is /are definitely true and t...
Statements: P # Q @ R & S $ T # W % I, K $ S @ L
Conclusions: I. K # I II. P & T
...Statements: Q > U = V ≤ X; R ≥ S ≥ X
Conclusions:
I. U = S
II. V < S
