Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
In A C Narayan vs State of Maharashtra, the court held that that the powerofattorney holder may be allowed to file, appear and depose for the purpose of issue of process for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the NI Act. An exception to the above is when the powerofattorney holder of the complainant does not have a personal knowledge about the transactions then he cannot be examined. However, where the attorney holder of the complainant is in charge of the business of the complainant payee and the attorney holder alone is personally aware of the transactions, there is no reason why the attorney holder cannot depose as a witness. Nevertheless, an explicit assertion as to the knowledge of the powerofattorney holder about the transaction in question must be specified in the complaint.
Where are the headquarters of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)?
Which of the following have been acknowledged as the most dependable electronic media entities in the nation in accordance with the 2023 issue of the Re...
What is the total number of women who will be selected for the EmpowHER Biz initiative under WEP to receive a 100% franchise fee waiver?
Which portal has been launched to monitor child care institutions across the country?
Recently, scientists discovered massive, long-necked dinosaur 'titan' in which country and named it as Garumbatitan morellensis?
According to the United Nations, in the last 15 years, India lifted how many million people out of poverty?
Which state government recently unveiled the 'Mukhyamantri Teerth Darshan Yojana,' a pilgrimage scheme for senior citizens of all religions?
Who were the Indian players in the men’s doubles final at the Malaysia Open Super 1000?
Which movie won the best feature film award in the 69th National Film Awards 2023?
When is GST Day celebrated every year?