Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
In A C Narayan vs State of Maharashtra, the court held that that the powerofattorney holder may be allowed to file, appear and depose for the purpose of issue of process for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the NI Act. An exception to the above is when the powerofattorney holder of the complainant does not have a personal knowledge about the transactions then he cannot be examined. However, where the attorney holder of the complainant is in charge of the business of the complainant payee and the attorney holder alone is personally aware of the transactions, there is no reason why the attorney holder cannot depose as a witness. Nevertheless, an explicit assertion as to the knowledge of the powerofattorney holder about the transaction in question must be specified in the complaint.
Consider the following statements with respect to Jizyah in DelhiSultanate:
1. Hindu subjects were subjected to Jizyah as a tax paid in lieu of...
Battle of Chach was fought between the Ghaznavid army of Mahmud of Ghazni and the Hindu Shahi army of __________.
The First Battle of Tarain was fought in 1191 between Muhammad of Ghor and Prithviraj Chauhan. Prithviraj Chauhan was a king from the Chauhan dynasty wh...
Where did the great bathhouse of Sandhava civilization come from?
Consider the following statements with reference to the Kailash temple at Ellora:
1. It is the largest monolithic structure in the world.
...
The place where Mahatma Gandhi started his first satyagrah was?
With whom did Alberuni come to India?
Who was the last ruler of Gupta dynasty ?
Which among the following was founded by Gopal Krishna Gokhale?
Who established the Famine Commission in 1900?