Get Started with ixamBee
Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
In A C Narayan vs State of Maharashtra, the court held that that the powerofattorney holder may be allowed to file, appear and depose for the purpose of issue of process for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the NI Act. An exception to the above is when the powerofattorney holder of the complainant does not have a personal knowledge about the transactions then he cannot be examined. However, where the attorney holder of the complainant is in charge of the business of the complainant payee and the attorney holder alone is personally aware of the transactions, there is no reason why the attorney holder cannot depose as a witness. Nevertheless, an explicit assertion as to the knowledge of the powerofattorney holder about the transaction in question must be specified in the complaint.
What is the purpose of the recent partnership between SIDBI, C2treds, and UGRO Capital?
Where is the Head Quarter of Asian Clearing Union (ACU)?
As per Union Budget 2025-26, what is the total outlay proposed for the Nuclear Energy Mission aimed at Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)?
The Limit for Foreign Portfolio Investments under Voluntary Retention Route (VRR) is set to be enhanced to how much from 01.04.2022 by RBI:
On which date National Milk Day is celebrated annually?
What was the specific reason RBI imposed a penalty of ₹31.80 lakh on Bank of Maharashtra?
Following are the functions of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) except?
Who is the only Indian woman featured in Time Magazine's Women of the Year 2025 list?
Which co-oeprative bank has been recently included in the second schedule of RBI Act?
________ happen when RBI desires that liquidity should be squeezed from the economy but Banks are not eager to deposit money with RBI at rate fixed by RBI.
