Question
In Shreya Singhalys Linion of India, the Supreme Court
held that:Solution
The Supreme Court in the landmark judgment struck down section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 which provided provisions for the arrest of those who posted allegedly offensive content on the internet upholding freedom of expression. This Section 66A defined the punishment for sending “offensive” messages through a computer or any other communication device like a mobile phone or tablet and a conviction of it can fetch a maximum three years of jail and a fine. The case emphasized on the fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India, which challenged the constitutional validity of section 66A and led to the struck down of section 66A of the Information Technology Act 2000.
A makes an attempt to steal some jewels by breaking open a box, and finds after so opening the box, that there is no jewel in it. He has________________...
How many words are there in Preamble?
Transfer of property act______________________.
According to Indian Partnership Act, 1932 What entitlement does an outgoing partner or their estate have if the surviving partners continue the busines...
Which of the following is considered a Data Fiduciary?
Which of the following are the functions of MPEDA?
When a fact is declared to be a conclusive proof of other -
The term ‘industry’ has been defined under which Case?
Which of the following is not a Directive Principle of State policy as relating to International Peace and Security provided under Article 51 of the Con...
Under Section 18(3) of the DICGC Act, 1961, Ms. B, a depositor, maintains a Fixed Deposit (FD) of ₹4,00,000 with Bank Z. Ms. B also has an unsecured p...