Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
The Supreme Court in the landmark judgment struck down section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 which provided provisions for the arrest of those who posted allegedly offensive content on the internet upholding freedom of expression. This Section 66A defined the punishment for sending “offensive” messages through a computer or any other communication device like a mobile phone or tablet and a conviction of it can fetch a maximum three years of jail and a fine. The case emphasized on the fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India, which challenged the constitutional validity of section 66A and led to the struck down of section 66A of the Information Technology Act 2000.
The Central Government should make reference to the Selection Committee within how much time of occurrence of any vacancy in FSSAI on grounds other tha...
When is a gang rape said to have been committed?
Where the agent has himself an interest in the property which forms the subject-matter of the agency, the agency______________
Who among the following holds office during the pleasure of the President?
An auditor of a listed company shall not be appointer, if it is an individual as auditor, for __________________
Which section of the IPC lays down provisions relating to Doctrine of Jus Necessitates?
Which of the following best describes the principle of the "Rule of Law" as it relates to Article 14 of the Indian Constitution?
A desires, a court to give judgment that he is entitled to certain land in the possession of B or basis of certain facts. Which 'B' denies to be true un...
Which of the following is true?
When a person through agreement, misrepresentation or negligence makes the other person believe in certain things upon which the other person had taken ...