Question
Under Section 6 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882, Mr. P
executes a trust deed: "I transfer ₹50 lakhs to Mr. Q as trustee. Q shall invest the funds and apply the income for the education and welfare of such members of my grandchildren as Q in his discretion sees fit, including awarding scholarships to deserving students from the community." No specific beneficiaries are named, and no quantified shares are defined. Which of the following correctly determines the validity of this trust under Section 6?Solution
Explanation: Section 6 of the Indian Trusts Act explicitly provides: "a trust is created when the author of the trust indicates with reasonable certainty by any words or acts (a) an intention on his part to create thereby a trust, (b) the purpose of the trust, (c) the beneficiary, and (d) the trust-property, and (unless the trust is declared by will or the author of the trust is himself to be the trustee) transfers the trust-property to the trustee." All four elements must be satisfied with reasonable certainty. The question's trust fails on element (c): "such members of my grandchildren as Q sees fit" does NOT identify beneficiaries with reasonable certainty. The phrase "such members...as Q sees fit" grants the trustee complete discretion but does not define the class of beneficiaries with sufficient clarity. Courts distinguish between: (i) fixed trusts (beneficiaries and shares specified); (ii) discretionary trusts (beneficiaries specified as a class, trustee discretion on distribution quantum/timing); and (iii) invalid trusts (beneficiaries not ascertainable as a class). Here, if the phrase means "all grandchildren," that is ascertainable. But "such members...as Q sees fit" suggests selection from an undefined pool. Additionally, mixing community scholarships with family welfare creates ambiguity about the beneficiary class. Section 6 illustration (c) provides: "A bequeaths certain property to B, requesting him to distribute it amongst such members of C's family as B should think most deserving. This does not create a trust, for the beneficiaries are not indicated with reasonable certainty." This directly parallels the question's scenario. Thus, option (B) correctly applies Section 6's four certainties requirement.
A woman invested a certain amount in scheme 'A' at simple interest of 18% p.a. for 4 years. She then reinvested the total amount received in scheme 'B' ...
A woman lent Rs. 29500 at 13% p.a. compound interest, compounded annually for two years. After two years, the total amount earned by the woman is again ...
Rs. 5,100 is invested in three parts all at simple interest of 8% p.a. These three parts are invested randomly for 1 year, 2 years and 5 years such tha...
A sum is lent on compound interest for 2 years at 9% p.a. If the compound interest on the sum is Rs.2257.2, find the sum.
Amit invested 'x' on simple interest at 12% for 7 years and (x + 400) on compound interest at 10% p.a for 2 years. At the end of nine years, he will rec...
Mark invested Rs 15,000 in a scheme at simple interest 20% per annum. After three years he withdrew the principal amount plus invested the entire amount...
The list price of product A is Rs. 80 less than the selling price of product B. The list price of product B is 60% higher than the selling price of prod...
Ravi lends Rs. 4800 to two of his friends. He gives Rs.2400 to the first at 15% p.a. simple interest. Ravi wants to make a profit of 20% on the whole. T...
'S' undertook an investment endeavor by allocating a capital denoted as 'a + 1000' into a scheme yielding a straightforward interest rate of 20% per ann...
Elvish invested Rs. 5000 in a compound interest scheme for 2 years at an annual interest rate of m%. If the compound interest obtained was Rs. 1272, fin...